Day Eight: Ordi­nary Heretic

So, Pam, you’ve been called a heretic, is that right?” asked the pro­gram host of OPB’s Think Out Loud radio show. “Yes,” I chuck­led, “I have.”

Her ques­tion sur­prised me. Some­one did there research! I can­not even remem­ber if I ever blogged about that, about Ken Silva, the cel­e­brated heresy hunter of Appris­ing Min­istries,
out­ing me at his blog. It’s been about a year since Silva posted a crit­i­cism on his blog about an arti­cle I wrote for Off the Map:

I found out that Jesus loves pagans. He’s not offended by their beliefs of many deities or their out­right rejec­tion of him as the Son of God. But that’s the whole point, isn’t it, of the Gospel, to rec­on­cile peo­ple to friend­ship with God? (Online source)

At least so says Pam Hodgeweide and other man-​​centered semi-​​pelagians in the emerg­ing church. If the Lord allows I’ll get to Hodgewide another time, but for now I point out that she hap­pens to a con­tribut­ing writer for the very appro­pri­ately named Off The Map (OTM) whose co-​​founder and Exec­u­tive Direc­tor is Jim Hen­der­son:

(well, the heresy here is not what I wrote for OTM about pagans, but that Silva spelled my name wrong!)

Later, when a(blog­ger Mike Mor­rel was “outed” by Silva, I left this comment:

…it cracks me up. in some cir­cles to be labeled the H word would inspire fear and trem­bling. but in other cir­cles, peo­ple prac­ti­cally erupt with applause and whoo-hoo’s. It’s like a badge of merit. “Oh, someone’s call­ing me a heretic? Yes! This means I’m finally mak­ing waves!”

I saw some­one at my local library wear­ing a t-​​shirt that said “Embrace your inner heretic.” The shirt was cov­ered with names of peo­ple who’ve been accused of heresy over the cen­turies, like Joan of Arc, Jesus, Galileo, Mar­tin Luther, etc…

Ok. Clearly the H word does not bother me or many oth­ers in the least. Espe­cially since the prac­tice of burn­ing heretics at the stake was aban­doned long ago. Thank God.

Silva has stopped by my blog and OTM’s blog a time or two. And though we obvi­ously are far from agree­ing with one another about doc­trine and Chris­t­ian prac­tices, he has always con­ducted him­self respect­fully. He has, what I call, good blog man­ners. So with that in mind, I was dis­mayed to learn that his blog was pulled by his server due to a com­plaint by some­one Silva crit­i­cized sev­eral years ago. The server demanded that Silva remove the arti­cle from his blog or else the whole blog would be shut down. Silva, refus­ing to be cen­sored, began scram­bling for a new server and refused to com­ply. Good for him. His voice is an impor­tant voice in the blo­gos­phere and to shut him down just because one per­son felt defamed…which really, if you’re going to write books and such as the “defamed” per­son does then ya gotta expect some pub­lic crit­i­cisms of your message.

Ore­gon writer and blog­ger, Sally Stu­art, rightly observes when she blogged:

There are seri­ous impli­ca­tions here for all blog­gers, regard­less of what sort of blog they pub­lish. Any­one who has a com­plaint about your views can claim that you have engaged in slan­der and the ISP Terms of Ser­vice usu­ally allow for the com­pa­nies to remove your web­site if you don’t take the mate­r­ial in ques­tion down. The First Amend­ment means noth­ing in these cases. ISP’s can­not and will not explore the claims of slan­der and sim­ply notify blog­gers to remove what­ever is caus­ing the prob­lem. This opens the door for any­one to cen­sor what a blog­ger writes online.

(you can read all about the mess at Silva’s new and uncen­sored site HERE)

Heretic. What is a heretic? Why does this word carry so much power? Dic​tio​nary​.com defines heretic as this:

a pro­fessed believer who main­tains reli­gious opin­ions con­trary to those accepted by his or her church or rejects doc­trines pre­scribed by that church; any­one who does not con­form to an estab­lished atti­tude, doc­trine, or principle.

Yep. That pretty much nails me and a whole lotta peo­ple I know. I think we have more heretics among us than we real­ize. They’re hid­ing in the closet, like smok­ing Chris­tians who hide their cig­a­rettes when cer­tain peo­ple around, many Chris­tians hide some of their beliefs behind closed closet doors.

I had a con­ver­sa­tion sev­eral months ago with a man who believes in uni­ver­sal rec­on­cil­i­a­tion (that all shall ulti­mately be saved and none shall spend eter­nity damned to hell). In our con­ver­sa­tion he told me that dur­ing his time at sem­i­nary he began his study of this per­spec­tive and wrote a paper about it. He con­sulted with sev­eral the­ol­ogy pro­fes­sors at his con­ser­v­a­tive sem­i­nary and was sur­prised to learn that some of them were also rec­on­cil­i­a­tion­ists. These the­olo­gians did not pub­licly teach this posi­tion out of neces­sity : they didn’t want to lose their jobs. And why would this put their livli­hood in jea­pordy? Because in many the­o­log­i­cal cir­cles it is con­sid­ered hereti­cal to embrace uni­ver­sal reconciliation.

In con­trast, I am a happy heretic. I freely blog and speak about what I believe and put my hope in. (such as the fact that I am an unapolo­getic hope­ful rec­on­cil­i­a­tion­ist). I am not clos­eted up with my beliefs in the shad­ows. This blog is proof of that.

I am not a the­olo­gian. I am not a teacher. But I am a writer, a blog­ger, a thinker who likes to go off the grid into once for­bid­den places of Chris­t­ian thought and spir­i­tu­al­ity. That’s what I do. There is no risk for me. No voca­tion that could be threat­ened by such adven­tures in faith.

For me, doc­tri­nal error is not nearly as impor­tant as how I treat peo­ple and how I honor God in my life. Jesus summed up all the law, in other words, all doc­trine, when he taught, Love the Lord with every­thing you’ve got, and love your neigh­bor as well as your­self. Love, is the sum of the law. Love, is the sum of doc­trine. There is no room for cast­ing stones at peo­ple I am in dis­agree­ment with over doc­trine. I can­not fault the heresy hunters who feel that it would be less than lov­ing of them to sound the alarm, and for that, I gotta love them and see past their inflam­ma­tory rhetoric.

For me, the great­est heresy is to lead oth­ers away from friend­ship with God in the way that I live my life or treat oth­ers. If by my actions or words I inspire oth­ers to a decrease in faith in the good­ness of the Lord, this, my friends, is what would break my heart and flood me with remorse.
But if by my words and my life I help oth­ers on their jour­ney towards their father in heaven, well, heretic or not, I think I’m on the right track.

Heresy. I’d love to see the new here­sies of the 21st cen­tury be more about prac­tice rather than belief.

Did this post res­onate with you? Pass it on!

Comments

Day Eight: Ordi­nary Heretic — 6 Comments

  1. co-​​heir, back at ya,except for the Ms. part!

    hey tracy, have you tried café press? they have a kazil­lion t-​​shirts. i seri­ously have con­sid­ered hav­ing that as a tat­too. the word Heretic, some­where on me, but i likely won’t. i like pretty, girly tat­toos. and heretic with lit­tle flow­ers and vines just doesn’t quite seem to be a good fit. i’ll look for a tshirt too and let you know if i locate one.

    hey kathy, can you imag­ine this con­ver­sa­tion, say, five years ago? wow, what a dis­tance you and i have both cov­ered in really, a short amount of time. So hey, glad to hear that you’ve been “sil­va­sized” by the man him­self. What’s crazy, is that the author who was offended by Silva didn’t even con­tact Silva to ask him first to take it down (though he likely would have said no any­way.) the author did not attempt any nego­ti­a­tion with silva and instead went for the jugu­lar of hav­ing his blog pulled. that is the part that i think is the most out­ra­geous. and while silva, in his zeal as a “watch dog” barks alot as the scrip­ture police, i’ve never read any­thing he’s put out that attacked people’s char­ac­ter or was vicious. Crit­i­cal, yes, nit-​​picky, yes, heavy handed, yes, and though I haven’t read a whole lot of Silva’s posts, the ones I have seen were crit­i­cal in the realm of bib­li­cal inter­pre­ta­tion per his world­view. Cool. No prob­lem with that at all. And here’s the other thing: the offended author claimed that Silva’s “slan­der­ous” writ­ing could affect his livli­hood as an author who has 20 books under his belt. Paleeze!!! He gives Silva way too much credit to have that kind of power, and really, doesn’t he know the axiom, Bad pub­lic­ity is bet­ter than no publicity?

    When my book comes out, I hope Silva takes it through the trenches. And I’ll link to it. I promise.

    Hey Vivian, and I love you, too, and I LOVE that you love my blog and that you stop by to visit often. WHEN ARE YOU COMING TO PORTLAND!!!!!!!!!!

  2. I love this and I love you! I know I write that every­time I leave a com­ment but it REALLY is true!

    And for the record I have been pass­ing around your blog link cause I love it so much! I hope some of my friends jump into the conversation!

  3. oh i love my hereti­cal friends! yeah, ken silva womped me and the refuge a while back. we just laughed and said “well, we’re in good com­pany!” i do not think they should shut him down, though, i really believe in free speech & even though i don’t agree with the tac­tics, etc., i think it is up to read­ers to choose to not read as opposed to not allow­ing a plat­form at all. yeah, i love that all major move­ments of change always include peo­ple labeled “heretics”.… love from CO.

  4. I would so love that t-​​shirt! Googled it to no avail :).

    I had no idea the exact def­i­n­i­tion of a heretic was so sim­ple. All of my friends are heretics by that def­i­n­i­tion. I’m glad!