I Am Not a Good Chris­t­ian Woman. Nei­ther Was Jesus.

i used to be a really good chris­t­ian woman.  like one of the best.  i said the right things, did the right things, played nice.   the only prob­lem was that what was on the out­side & what was on the inside were two dif­fer­ent things.i believe evan­gel­i­cal chris­tian­ity has cre­ated a lot of divided women.

women who are cut off from their desires.  who are pulling it together on the out­side but crum­bling on the inside.  who are con­stantly feel­ing like losers, always miss­ing the good-​​christian-​​woman-​​wife-​​or-​​mother-​​mark.  who are afraid to dream. or take care of our­selves. or want some­thing more because it can be per­ceived as self­ish. who love God but aren’t sure God really loves us just-​​as-​​we-​​are because we’ve been bom­barded with teach­ing about our deprav­ity & eve-​​nature & how we need to be more like proverbs 31.

from Kathy Escobar’s, Ex-​​Good Chris­t­ian Women

I am an ex-​​good Chris­t­ian woman. Actu­ally. Scratch that. I don’t think I was EVER a good Chris­t­ian woman.  But I sure tried, and I tried hard for a long, long time.  The Good Chris­t­ian Woman was that elu­sive stan­dard that I never could quite mea­sure up to. I know a lot of other women who are the same. We aban­don our authen­tic selves as we strive to be Proverbs 31 head to toe, inside and out. We give our­selves away to a fault. I appre­ci­ate the Chris­t­ian dis­ci­pline of self-​​denial, yet when it comes to being a fol­lower of Jesus, women tweak it to a dif­fer­ent ideal of los­ing our self for the sake of who we imag­ine God wants us to be — the Good Chris­t­ian Woman. She’s a ghost of an ideal who haunts us to be just like her. Instead of press­ing for­ward in the quest for Christ like­ness, women like me get off course in  hot pur­suit of becom­ing the good Chris­t­ian woman. She is our saint, our matron of all that is holy and approved of by God. She is the vision of true Chris­t­ian wom­an­hood: sub­mis­sive, self-​​sacrificing, hum­ble and quiet. She is who I aspired to become.

But the good Chris­t­ian woman is a sem­blance of a human being who does not entirely exhibit her human­ity or oth­er­wise we would imag­ine her with a host of other human char­ac­ter­is­tics such as lead­er­ship, strength, intel­lec­tual prowess, and so on. But instead, the good Chris­t­ian woman is ide­al­ized with a few “fem­i­nine” qual­i­ties that are sup­pos­edly more sacred than other human qual­i­ties such as a sub­mis­sive­ness and a meek, quiet spirit. Throw in cre­ativ­ity and a flair for home décor and bak­ing and she is down­right the most mag­i­cal woman in the king­dom of God. She can pray, bake and teach Sun­day school. All at the same time. With a good, com­pli­ant attitude.

Fem­i­nine attrib­utes have become Chris­tian­ized and per­son­al­ized into a myth, a kind of Proverbs 31 man­nequin whom women are chal­lenged to emu­late. This does not honor a woman’s per­son­hood. Christ fol­low­ing women are meant to trans­form into the image of Jesus, but this image of bib­li­cal wom­an­hood has taken over.

Cul­tural con­di­tion­ing, includ­ing church cul­ture, shapes and informs who we think we are meant to be. Women mix up fem­i­nine char­ac­ter­is­tics with Christ’s char­ac­ter­is­tics. My fem­i­nin­ity has always felt a chal­lenge from cul­tural mes­sag­ing about whether or not I am girly enough. A tomboy at heart and play, I have just never quite taken a shine to pink fin­ger­nail pol­ish or flowy, lacy skirts. When I became a Christ fol­lower at age eigh­teen, that ten­der thresh­old of tran­si­tion from girl to woman, I sud­denly found myself plunged into a new cul­ture with a new vision of what it is to be a woman.

I lean into the rough and tum­ble of grit rather than glam to this day in my middle-​​aged years.

Through­out my jour­ney as a Christ fol­lower, I have inter­nal­ized this image to be a good Chris­t­ian woman instead of inter­nal­iz­ing the Per­son of Christ. This ideal of a good Chris­t­ian woman is not a human being — but an invented being. Who invented her? I’m not sure, though I sus­pect she was born from  a com­bi­na­tion of the per­fec­tion­is­tic flog­gings that drive many women to become who we are not as well as the con­di­tion­ing from the spirit of patri­archy that always seeks to keep it’s women under control.

Being less than girly my entire life has not just been a cul­tural affront, but a chal­lenge to reflect­ing the image of the good Chris­t­ian woman into my life. She is not who I can ever be. I am no good at being demure. I am nei­ther soft-​​spoken nor gentle-​​mannered. I do not restrain my words very well and I lack the pro­pri­ety to just be silent. I am head­strong and will­ful and enjoy rig­or­ous debate. I lean into the rough and tum­ble of grit rather than glam to this day in my middle-​​aged years.

I have tried hard to fol­low Jesus. I’ve prayed the prayers for him to trans­form me into a bet­ter per­son, into a good Chris­t­ian woman. I’ve chased after her and entreated heaven to help me catch her. But I never have and I never will. So I have had to let her go, to dis­man­tle the boards of the altar that I built for her within. In let­ting go of her, I dis­cov­ered not only more of who I really am, the authen­tic me, but I read­justed my path to find­ing more of Christ. He is who I follow.

I am not a good Chris­t­ian woman. I am a human being, a unique indi­vid­ual with cus­tomized fea­tures that are all my own. I have been made in the image of God, my sin­gu­lar life a sliver of the grand­ness of who God is and what God is like. My female­ness is a part of me, but it is not all of me. I do not have to con­form to the image of a good Chris­t­ian woman; I want to instead, con­form to the image of Jesus. He was not a good Chris­t­ian woman either.

***Are you famil­iar with the good Chris­t­ian woman? If you’ve met her, hook me up. I want to inter­view her!!

Did this post res­onate with you? Pass it on!

Comments

I Am Not a Good Chris­t­ian Woman. Nei­ther Was Jesus. — 35 Comments

  1. This is awe­some! I think the ideals we set up for our­selves under the name of Chris­tian­ity are just mor­tal ideals. They have every­thing to deal with the human side of us and very lit­tle to do with the spirit side.

    I think that if you help peo­ple, live well, take time to enjoy god’s plea­sures and work as hard as you can towards a bet­ter world…you’re liv­ing in the image of Christ And that’s what’s important.

    It reminds me of this video I recently came across– it’s a cute lit­tle song about how Jesus and his fol­low­ers actu­ally Occupy Jerusalem.

    Any­ways, here it is: http://​youtu​.be/​a​6​a​k​k​b​_​a​fqs

    • Hi Kristina, thanks so much for your com­ment. I am with you— lets treat other well and that will def make not only our small world a bet­ter place, butcher Entire World! This is the way of Jesus, to treat oth­ers as you want to be treated.

      And nobody wants to be treated in a sub­servient sec­ond class way.

      Appre­ci­ate you stop­ping by. Come see us again!

  2. Exactly what I need to read to keep myself from feel­ing crazy. I am notic­ing that the more I step into who God made me the less peo­ple want to be around me. Glad I know you and the other amaz­ing women that have stepped into my life. Us youngish ladies really need that sup­port in this chang­ing world.

  3. ***. I am nei­ther soft-​​​​spoken nor gentle-​​​​mannered. I do not restrain my words very well and I lack the pro­pri­ety to just be silent**

    I thank God for you. Xxxx

  4. My fem­i­nin­ity has always felt a chal­lenge from cul­tural mes­sag­ing about whether or not I am girly enough. A tomboy at heart and play, I have just never quite taken a shine to pink fin­ger­nail pol­ish or flowy, lacy skirts. When I became a Christ fol­lower at age eigh­teen, that ten­der thresh­old of tran­si­tion from girl to woman, I sud­denly found myself plunged into a new cul­ture with a new vision of what it is to be a woman.

    In other words, you were a Rain­bow Dash and were told that “God Com­mands You to Be Flut­ter­shy — Or Else!”

  5. First, I want to say that I was encour­aged by the respect­ful responses to Rex. As for his state­ment, “we can pur­sue what our Cre­ator first deter­mined for us to be our pur­pose  —  being human, fully,” I think that is exactly the point you were mak­ing in the first place! The Cre­ator deter­mined that we would be human, fully, by dying to self and allow­ing Christ to live in and through us through the Holy Spirit.

    Here’s the rub: Christ is not a good Chris­t­ian woman!

    We are all exhorted to be con­formed to the image of Christ; this is not a gender-​​specific com­mand. You can­not be con­formed to the image of this so-​​called “GCW” and the image of Christ at the same time because the two are dia­met­ri­cally opposed.

    I will be the first to admit that my gram­mar is hor­ren­dous, but I will also say that I was able to fol­low your train of thought eas­ily. I don’t think many peo­ple would get side­tracked with these kinds of Ad Hominem manip­u­la­tion tac­tics. If a good coun­ter­ar­gu­ment can’t be made on the actual argu­ment itself, then chances are your argu­ment is solid. My guess is that this per­son is sim­ply grasp­ing at straws to try and dis­credit you.

    Keep up the good work. There are many of us out there who need Chris­t­ian women like you to stand up and be a voice for us.

    • Hey Des,
      I sus­pect that Rex and I agree more than dis­agree on the points of this blog post. My writ­ing style dis­tracted him and the real­ity is that my writ­ing voice is not for every­one. I am grate­ful, though, that my writ­ing style does res­onate with many other read­ers who enjoy how I com­mu­ni­cate. Being a pub­lic writer always means allow­ing for room to be crit­i­cized and chal­lenged. As long as it is respect­ful and not abu­sive, I wel­come it.

      Thanks for read­ing and com­ment­ing. I will be blog­ging more around this theme as I ready myself for my next book project. Thought­ful com­ments from my read­ers will def­i­nitely be help­ful as I go deeper into a new wilder­ness of my wom­anly soul. I know other women have gone far ahead of me in regard to authen­tic­ity and iden­tity, but this is my story. I get to do the telling. And I want to tell it true and tell it strong. Blog­ging is where I first test the waters of what I want to tell.

      Stay tuned!

  6. Pam. Pam. Pam.
    I owe you my best fist pound or chest bump when we finally do meet. This is hon­est, pro­vok­ing and pow­er­ful. Good for you for bravely stok­ing the con­ver­sa­tion. I too have never seen the GCW in the mir­ror and quite frankly, I’m not sure how one breathes under all those lay­ers of expec­ta­tion. I have how­ever seen myself dis­tant from Christ as often as walk­ing in step with Him and I much pre­fer the On-​​Christ me to the Off. His peo­ple, their meth­ods, their places of wor­ship and their bur­dens — well, He’s con­tin­u­ally soft­en­ing my heart to be less inter­ested in what oth­ers are heap­ing ON me and more grate­ful for that which He has taken OFF me. I have long searched for like-​​minded women. Women who are more inter­ested in a mir­ror that tells us what Jesus likes about us, what the enemy fears about us and how we are most effec­tive in this moment than those tired look­ing glasses and jaded reflec­tions that tell us we don’t mea­sure up.
    Seri­ously awe­some stuff you’re stir­ring up here. And a very ‘un-​​ladylike’ chest bump to you.

    • HI Leah,
      Thanks so much for read­ing and for your kind words! I am think­ing that you and I can talk an after­noon away if we had the chance. Oh,wait.…we get that chance this Sat­ur­day! Will be so great to meet you face to face and hear more of your story. I love hear­ing and learn­ing from the expe­ri­ences of oth­ers. These days I am espe­cially curi­ous about other Christ fol­low­ing women who are unlay­er­ing them­selves from cul­tural and reli­gious mes­sag­ing in order to uncover their authen­tic selves. True iden­tity has become my new quest.

      Let’s talk about that on Sat­ur­day. I look so for­ward to meet­ing you!!

  7. Pingback: a more honest theology. | kathy escobar.

  8. Is the “Good Xian Woman” also a great writer? Clearly, she must be because you seem to have eschewed gram­mer and proper syn­tax in favor of what, exactly, I can­not sur­mise. Thought frag­ments are friendly to no writer, whichever gen­der, and nei­ther are mis­placed clauses. In fact, the lat­ter under­mines your argu­ment by lit­er­ally plac­ing the traits you wish to cham­pion safely in the camp of ideals you wish to debase. And I quote, “…the good Chris­t­ian woman is ide­al­ized with a few “fem­i­nine” qual­i­ties that are sup­pos­edly more sacred than other human qual­i­ties such as a sub­mis­sive­ness and a meek, quiet spirit.” Who’s side are these traits on, exactly? And what does, “Christ fol­low­ing women are meant to trans­form into the image of Jesus, but this image of bib­li­cal wom­an­hood has taken over,” even mean? The first two words should be hyphen­ated, for a start.
    These are just a few exam­ples of how your ter­ri­ble writ­ing dis­tracts from the mes­sage you wish to issue. This mes­sage, how­ever, is weak in itself. On the one hand, you, “appre­ci­ate the Chris­t­ian dis­ci­pline of self-​​​​denial,” and yet make allu­sive honor to traits that are more fully, ‘human,’ then reneg. Your point is intel­lec­tu­ally lack­ing the full­ness nec­es­sary to indi­cate that you have actu­ally thought the mat­ter through and come to a proper con­clu­sion. But, thanks for the effort.
    Mean­while, per­haps some fig­u­ra­tive writ­ing could help to illu­mi­nate what per­haps ought to be the crux of a dis­cus­sion weigh­ing the respec­tive mer­its of human­ism and Christ’s sal­va­tion. With­out Christ, we humans are ever so dis­tracted by the con­se­quence of our sin. Christ made his sac­ri­fice to pro­vide the assur­ance that we would not have to pay for the afore­men­tioned sin, but that sal­va­tion has to be accepted in order to be effec­tive. Once accepted, and not there­after denied, being freed from this pre­oc­cu­pa­tion, we can pur­sue what our Cre­ator first deter­mined for us to be our pur­pose — being human, fully.

    • Rex, I have a few com­ments in response to your com­ment:
      First of all, please note that the cor­rect spelling is “gram­mar,” not “gram­mer.“
      A bit later, you ask, “Who’s side are these traits on, exactly?” I believe you meant, “WHOSE.” The word “who’s” is a con­trac­tion for “Who is,” which is obvously an incor­rect usage of the word in this con­text. “Whose” is a pos­ses­sive pro­noun, which is the word you need to use in this sen­tence.
      Finally, I take issue with your sen­tence, “But, thanks for the effort.” Begin­ning a sen­tence with “But” makes it a frag­ment, accord­ing to every Eng­lish class I have ever attended or taught, and writ­ers are sup­posed to avoid frag­ments. Besides, plac­ing a comma AFTER the word “but” is incor­rect also. If that frag­ment had been made a part of a com­pound sen­tence, the comma would be placed cor­rectly BEFORE the word “but.“
      If you are going to chas­tise some­one for their gram­mat­i­cal errors, please be cer­tain that your own response is flawless.

      • Thanks, Deb! I’m glad some­one caught my inten­tional trap with who’s/whose. I couldn’t help lay­ing it. I do admit, though, that I was rely­ing too heav­ily on spellchecker for ‘gram­mar’. I also admit that I love the Oxford comma because it makes writ­ing seem more like talk­ing.
        How about that last para­graph, though? Can’t we just accept Jesus and move on with our lives?
        As for the name, Pam, it is my han­dle. Try this page for insight: http://​www​.spir​it​mythos​.org/​T​M​/​s​o​l​a​r​-​l​u​n​a​r​/​r​e​x​m​u​n​d​i​.​htm Maybe you have already.

        • Well played, Rex. :) I am a bit of a Gram­mar Nazi (that’s what my last group of stu­dents affec­tion­ately – at least I hope it was affec­tion­ately – dubbed me), but I’m try­ing to cut back. I was hop­ing I didn’t sound nasty; I was hav­ing one of “those” morn­ings with my strong-​​willed non-​​GCW-​​like chil­dren (see my other post on here, lol) and prob­a­bly should have waited till I calmed down to post.
          As for just accept­ing Jesus and get­ting on with our lives, I wish it were that easy. Some of us just have trou­ble let­ting go of our bag­gage and have to process what we’ve expe­ri­enced before we can move on. Maybe that’s a sign that my faith isn’t as strong as some­one else’s, but then I fig­ure that Jesus can han­dle that, and he will allow me to process what I need to along the way. That’s what is so won­der­ful about our Sav­ior; He knows what we need and wants noth­ing more than to help us work through our issues to become whole.

        • Love it when folks talk about the craft of the Eng­lish language!

          Yes, that was one of the top hits that came up when I googled Rex Mundi. Great han­dle to use on the net, though I was not quite com­pre­hend­ing the expla­na­tion. Lotta words in there out­side of my hum­ble vocab­u­lary matrix. I still think it’s a cool name though. Rex Mundi. Sounds like a spy. Or an artist. Or a rockstar.

    • Hi Rex,

      Let me first thank you for tak­ing time to pause and not only read my blog but take the time to give your opin­ion. It is clear that my writ­ing style and per­spec­tive on being a “good Chris­t­ian woman” is not a good fit for you.

      I’ve been a blog­ger a long time. Pub­lic dis­course will nat­u­rally invite pub­lic crit­i­cism from time to time. I try to learn from my crit­ics. I learned alot from the name you are com­ment­ing under (see below).

      So. Thanks again for tak­ing time to offer your thoughts. I appre­ci­ate that you remained civil with your opin­ion. Respect­ful dis­agree­ment is always wel­come at this blog.

      ps: inter­est­ing choice for your inter­net name. i googled Rex Mundi. Wow.There’s a whole lot going on with that name, and the Dark Horse comic series looks intriguing…which on a side note, Dark Horse comics is located right here in Ore­gon. I know one of the guys over there. Just a bit of trivia to toss out for fun… though please let me know if this is your real name!

  9. Thank you thank you thank you. I am way into mid­dle age and I just wrote a blog about some­thing sim­i­lar. You have said what my heart has been cry­ing for years.

    • Hi Peggy,
      Thanks for read­ing and adding your com­ment. There seems to be a grow­ing col­lec­tive con­scious­ness about these things. I like to think that the Holy Spirit is stir­ring and agi­tat­ing women towards free­dom to be strong and true in who we are. The winds of change are blowing!

  10. Pam, this “con­fes­sion” will obvi­ous res­onate with many women, but I hope also it serves as a cue for the men who are feel­ing they don’t mea­sure up when in church cir­cles. We need so much more authen­tic­ity and so much less “Ozzie and Harriet”.

    • AL!! One of my favorite unla­dy­like men!

      Yes, def­i­nitely there is a “good Chris­t­ian man” ghost that haunts after our broth­ers. Maybe we need to start a new resis­tance move­ment against reli­gious ide­al­ism and instead pur­sue being kind and good Human Beings. Now there’s a thought.….!

  11. Thank you Pam. I think you nailed not only the essence of it but the mag­ni­tude also. Your blog is enlight­en­ing, inspir­ing, cleans­ing, reas­sur­ing, and even moti­vat­ing. There is such a sim­ple but immense energy that comes from claim­ing one’s truth, with­out mak­ing excuses. This is what I see you do.

    xoxo Wendy

    • Hi Wendy,
      Thanks for tak­ing to read AND to com­ment. (I love com­ments!!) Yes, this is a HUGE topic. My friend Kathy Esco­bar has writ­ten on it quite a bit. Poke around her blog fol­low­ing the link I have in this post. I some­times think about start­ing a chap­ter for Ex-​​Good Chris­t­ian Women.…or bet­ter yet, The Secret Soci­ety of No Good Chris­t­ian Women !! What do you think ? :)

  12. This is really awe­some and is true. Its amaz­ing how we go on about how we should be and how we should act instead of striv­ing to know more about Jesus and fol­low him. We have made chris­tian­ity a model.
    Wow!

    • Hi Rebonwe,
      Good to see you!! Thanks for adding your com­ment to this post. It is true how much we allow our iden­ti­ties to be hijacked for ideals that can­not be reached. It is true in all realms of life. I like to address it in the area of faith and spir­i­tu­al­ity for this is where my own iden­tity has been informed and shaped the most. I am now spend­ing a great deal of time relearn­ing Who I Really Am in all of my unique­ness. I may explore this more fully in my next book project. Stay tuned!!

      • Okay, I stayed up late last night jot­ting down some thoughts on this one. I hope I don’t start ram­bling, get­ting too far off course, or com­pletely take over the com­ments section.

        I have never been accused of being a Good Chris­t­ian Woman (GCW), or a Proverbs 31 woman, for that mat­ter. Hon­estly, I cringe when­ever I see Proverbs 31 listed as the ser­mon text at church, and I find it quite ironic that so many churches choose to use that par­tic­u­lar pas­sage on Moth­ers’ Day, a day meant to honor and uplift women. I don’t know about any­one else, but every time I hear a Proverbs 31 ser­mon, I come away feel­ing not uplifted and encour­aged, but rather guilt-​​ridden and dis­cour­aged because I do not resem­ble that woman at all. I do not even feel chal­lenged to strive towards an attain­able goal, but rather I feel defeated and like a fail­ure, and I don’t even want to try any­more. I never real­ized that the goal in ques­tion is not really a goal, but an ideal, a bar set so high that I can hardly even hope to touch it, let alone clear it.

        I did have to laugh at some of the lady­like qual­i­ties you listed – being able to pray, bake, teach Sun­day school and dec­o­rate a home, to name a few. I can bake from a box, but I’m sure that’s not accept­able or GCW-​​like. Now teach­ing Sun­day school, that I am good at, but I am unla­dy­like and inap­pro­pri­ate in the fact that I am not con­tent to limit myself to teachng women and chil­dren; I aspire to teach cou­ples’ classes or gen­eral inter­est classes attended by both men and women. I don’t feel that is looked upon with favor in our par­tic­u­lar denomination.

        Hon­estly, I even have a hard time form­ing friend­ships with the GCWs in our denom­i­na­tion because I do feel so inap­pro­pri­ate and infe­rior next to them. I was raised to value edu­ca­tion, and I have always loved an intel­lec­tual chal­lenge. While our church has noth­ing against women seek­ing to be edu­cated, I don’t think it was deemed appro­pri­ate that I was attend­ing sem­i­nary with the hopes of becom­ing a pas­tor some­day. While other women were pur­su­ing the abil­ity to sten­cil their liv­ing room walls or to cre­ate a scrap­book of each invdi­vid­ual child, I was study­ing hermeneu­tics and ser­mon prepa­ra­tion. Then when my chil­dren came along, I felt even more out of the GCW loop. Many of the women I knew breast­fed their infants (some­thing I was phys­i­cally unable to do) and home­schooled their older chil­dren. Their homes were pris­tine and spot­less, with nary a toy or book out of place. Their fur­ni­ture was always clean and unworn. All their meals were made from scratch with pro­duce picked from their own gar­dens. Their children’s hours were filled with crafts, whole­some games and play dates with chil­dren of other GCWs. Let’s not for­get that the chil­dren were always com­pli­ant, well-​​behaved, help­ful and godly. They spoke of Jesus with­out being prompted and sang only wor­ship cho­ruses. On more than one occa­sion, I was chas­tised for my children’s strong-​​willed behav­ior and was even blamed for it because I com­mit­ted the sin of allow­ing them to watch Sponge­Bob and Scooby Doo, some­thing a true GCW would never do.

        I tried and tried over the years to live up to this ideal, and like you, I just couldn’t do it. I never real­ized that what was truly miss­ing in all my striv­ing was the desire to be like Christ, instead of like Ms. Proverbs 31. So thank you for your thoughts, and thank you for allow­ing me to bab­ble in response.